|
weight control, fax toner cartridge, tanita bf682, hiv, lipids, bjc, publishing, eating disorder, copier toner, grabber, e journal, fat tester, royal copy star, skin fold caliper, body fat monitor, brother, minerals, beef,
|
For the hydrostatic weighing method, that Probable Error is generally much less than 1%. This implies that if ONE measurement is done, it is likely to be accurate to within 1%. When such statistical analysis has been done regarding bodyfat calipers or bioelectric impedance or the other (inexpensive) alternatives, the probable error has nearly always been teller ulam device greater than 10%. Very few actual scientific studies have been done regarding teller ulam device such products, but some have teller ulam device even sugggested that +/-15% is not unusual. This implies that if ONE measurement was done, the value obtained IS LIKELY TO BE off (in either direction) by that large value. With such terrible accuracy, getting a reading of 19% (a nice result!) could actually mean 34% (seriously obese) or 4% (professional athlete). Pretty much a meaningless result, except for being able to brag about a 19% bodyfat content!
|
